<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Velocity and Memcache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/</link>
	<description>Modern Art makes me want to rock out</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ehcache.net</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-164803</link>
		<dc:creator>ehcache.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-164803</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Velocity and Memcache...&lt;/strong&gt;

I’m looking forward to checking this out soon- we have had a ton of success using memcache on the LAMP platform and it was a missing piece in the .NET world. I understand why it was a bit hard to see its importance in that environment- Unlike PHP, .NET...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft Velocity and Memcache&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I’m looking forward to checking this out soon- we have had a ton of success using memcache on the LAMP platform and it was a missing piece in the .NET world. I understand why it was a bit hard to see its importance in that environment- Unlike PHP, .NET&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-140854</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-140854</guid>
		<description>Sanjay said:
&#62; I have just deployed Microsoft Velocity. As compared to NCache, when a velocity server goes down the data is lost.

I believe Velocity supports both plain partitioning, similar to Memcached, and replication to avoid such failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanjay said:<br />
&gt; I have just deployed Microsoft Velocity. As compared to NCache, when a velocity server goes down the data is lost.</p>
<p>I believe Velocity supports both plain partitioning, similar to Memcached, and replication to avoid such failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-112469</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-112469</guid>
		<description>I have just deployed Microsoft Velocity. As compared to NCache, when a velocity server goes down the data is lost. In NCache the data is redistributed to the other nodes on the cluster. This is in the case of both sudden crash of the server or a graceful shutdown. As compared to memcached Velocity causes more traffic on the network and a sudden jump to CPU and network usage. Seems like Velocity needs a more stronger archeitecture to support such advanced features. Except for the price, NCache would still be my choice of in memory cache.

I wish NCache would spend some time evaluating Velocity. From all the posts I have seen around, it seems like Ncache is just pasting the same blog text everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just deployed Microsoft Velocity. As compared to NCache, when a velocity server goes down the data is lost. In NCache the data is redistributed to the other nodes on the cluster. This is in the case of both sudden crash of the server or a graceful shutdown. As compared to memcached Velocity causes more traffic on the network and a sudden jump to CPU and network usage. Seems like Velocity needs a more stronger archeitecture to support such advanced features. Except for the price, NCache would still be my choice of in memory cache.</p>
<p>I wish NCache would spend some time evaluating Velocity. From all the posts I have seen around, it seems like Ncache is just pasting the same blog text everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iqbal Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-26550</link>
		<dc:creator>Iqbal Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-26550</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

NCache pricing is per CPU and it does not count any cores. So, a dual-core CPU is considered 1 CPU.

NCache is the most featureful .NET distributed cache and offers a lot of very important features that Memcache does not provide. To start with, you get 100% uptime due to dynaimc clustering in NCache. Then, you have various caching topologies including Mirrored, Replicated, Partitioned, and Client Cache.

So, you really need to see the cost to your business of downtime or inability to scale. NCache comes with full support as well (including 24x7 support option).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>NCache pricing is per CPU and it does not count any cores. So, a dual-core CPU is considered 1 CPU.</p>
<p>NCache is the most featureful .NET distributed cache and offers a lot of very important features that Memcache does not provide. To start with, you get 100% uptime due to dynaimc clustering in NCache. Then, you have various caching topologies including Mirrored, Replicated, Partitioned, and Client Cache.</p>
<p>So, you really need to see the cost to your business of downtime or inability to scale. NCache comes with full support as well (including 24&#215;7 support option).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-22167</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-22167</guid>
		<description>NCache looks interesting, although I've got to say the pricing of $1000/cpu seems stratospheric. I can't find anywhere on the site that says whether that is per-core or per physical chip, but still $2000-$8000 per server when we typically spec out servers that cost less than $2000 for high-end 8-core systems is way too much (especially given the free availability of memcache).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCache looks interesting, although I&#8217;ve got to say the pricing of $1000/cpu seems stratospheric. I can&#8217;t find anywhere on the site that says whether that is per-core or per physical chip, but still $2000-$8000 per server when we typically spec out servers that cost less than $2000 for high-end 8-core systems is way too much (especially given the free availability of memcache).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadi</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-21957</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-21957</guid>
		<description>NCache has been the caching solution of choice for various mission critical applications throughout the world since 2005. Its scalability, high availability and performance are the reasons why NCache has earned the trust of developers, senior IT and management personnel within high profile companies. These companies are involved in a range of endeavors including ecommerce, financial services, health services and airline services.

The range of features that NCache currently showcases are highly competitive and revolutionary. It supports dynamic clustering, local and remote clients, advanced caching topologies like replicated and mirrored, partitioned and replicated partitioned. It also provides an overflow cache, eviction strategies, read-through and write-through capabilities, cache dependencies, event notifications and object query language facilities. For a complete list of features and details please visit http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html 

Download a 60 day trial enterprise/developer version or totally free NCache Express from www.alachisoft.com/download.html

Team NCache</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCache has been the caching solution of choice for various mission critical applications throughout the world since 2005. Its scalability, high availability and performance are the reasons why NCache has earned the trust of developers, senior IT and management personnel within high profile companies. These companies are involved in a range of endeavors including ecommerce, financial services, health services and airline services.</p>
<p>The range of features that NCache currently showcases are highly competitive and revolutionary. It supports dynamic clustering, local and remote clients, advanced caching topologies like replicated and mirrored, partitioned and replicated partitioned. It also provides an overflow cache, eviction strategies, read-through and write-through capabilities, cache dependencies, event notifications and object query language facilities. For a complete list of features and details please visit <a href="http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/index.html</a> </p>
<p>Download a 60 day trial enterprise/developer version or totally free NCache Express from <a href="http://www.alachisoft.com/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alachisoft.com/download.html</a></p>
<p>Team NCache</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/comment-page-1/#comment-19338</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/06/09/microsoft-velocity-and-memcache/#comment-19338</guid>
		<description>I know the guys at Server Intellect can install this on a VPS or dedicated server. We had it installed on our vps and is currently running without any hiccups yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the guys at Server Intellect can install this on a VPS or dedicated server. We had it installed on our vps and is currently running without any hiccups yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

