<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Caucus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/</link>
	<description>Modern Art makes me want to rock out</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Naffziger</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/comment-page-1/#comment-14291</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Naffziger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/#comment-14291</guid>
		<description>I've also heard good things (but was unfortunately out of town) about the caucus process.

However, I'm seriously disappointed with the super-delegate system.  Sure, no one cared when the contests were decided in Iowa, but I have to believe that a significant portion of the party will be disenfranchised if the popular delegate votes don't decide the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also heard good things (but was unfortunately out of town) about the caucus process.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m seriously disappointed with the super-delegate system.  Sure, no one cared when the contests were decided in Iowa, but I have to believe that a significant portion of the party will be disenfranchised if the popular delegate votes don&#8217;t decide the nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

