<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Caucus</title>
	<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/</link>
	<description>Modern Art makes me want to rock out</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave Naffziger</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/#comment-14291</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2008/02/10/washington-caucus/#comment-14291</guid>
					<description>I've also heard good things (but was unfortunately out of town) about the caucus process.

However, I'm seriously disappointed with the super-delegate system.  Sure, no one cared when the contests were decided in Iowa, but I have to believe that a significant portion of the party will be disenfranchised if the popular delegate votes don't decide the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also heard good things (but was unfortunately out of town) about the caucus process.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m seriously disappointed with the super-delegate system.  Sure, no one cared when the contests were decided in Iowa, but I have to believe that a significant portion of the party will be disenfranchised if the popular delegate votes don&#8217;t decide the nominee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
