24th July 2007

Sharpcast

posted in Photography, Technology |

I’ve been playing with Sharpcast a bit the last few days and even signed up for their premium service. The key hook there is that they offer to “backup” full-resolution copies of your images on their servers. The current offer has no quota associated with it which makes the $6/month very attractive. Uploading photos in one photo is really easy but it takes a bunch more work to upload a bunch of different folders. Still, as long as the unlimited photos thing holds out, it seems like a very nice service.

I’ve been playing with various ideas in this space and the Sharpcast guys have overall done a very good job. Nice client to web-site integration. Fairly good upload, although it will consume all available bandwidth if it can (be careful running it on a work network since you don’t want to bring everyone’s network to a grinding halt).

All the same there are some pretty key missing features. Its still early so I hope they will add these soon. I really miss being able to assign star-ratings to photos and to filter by the star ratings. For example I like to have available all the photos of a given event but usually just share out / use a slide show the 4-5 star ones. The client is also able to show composite albums/slideshows with sub-folders but the web-site can’t.

There is currently one response to “Sharpcast”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On July 24th, 2007, P Andrade said:

    I am have been also using this service and I am very happy so far. Regarding “Uploading photos in one [folder] is really easy but it takes a bunch more work to upload a bunch of different folders”. You can just drag and drop a folder with many sub and sub-sub (any levels) folders into the desktop client and it just works. I agree that the starts would be great!

    pa

Leave a Reply