<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cases for new computers</title>
	<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2007/04/10/cases-for-new-computers/</link>
	<description>Modern Art makes me want to rock out</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Zalman HD135 and HD160 &#187; AlexHopmann.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2007/04/10/cases-for-new-computers/#comment-3731</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alexhopmann.com/2007/04/10/cases-for-new-computers/#comment-3731</guid>
					<description>[...] Earlier I mentioned looking at the Zalman HD135 and HD160 cases for the new media computer I&#8217;m going to build this summer. I was at Frys earlier today and had a chance to check them both out in person. The HD135 looked much nicer than the HD160. The HD160 doesn&#8217;t use thumbscrews to get the case off- you have to remove 5 normal screws to open the case. Now, hopefully you aren&#8217;t doing that often, but it sounds like a major pain when you do. The HD135 seems to have plenty of room for everything, tons of drives, and its a bit smaller height (although slightly deeper but that should be ok). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Earlier I mentioned looking at the Zalman HD135 and HD160 cases for the new media computer I&#8217;m going to build this summer. I was at Frys earlier today and had a chance to check them both out in person. The HD135 looked much nicer than the HD160. The HD160 doesn&#8217;t use thumbscrews to get the case off- you have to remove 5 normal screws to open the case. Now, hopefully you aren&#8217;t doing that often, but it sounds like a major pain when you do. The HD135 seems to have plenty of room for everything, tons of drives, and its a bit smaller height (although slightly deeper but that should be ok). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
